Legal Opinion

Paul v. Barhydt

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided December 3, 1963Published

1Opinion of the CourtHulburd, C. J.

The plaintiff by a writ of summons and attachment sought to recover for material and labor furnished the defendants, John Barhydt and Elizabeth D. Barhydt, of Woodstock, Vermont. The record shows that service was made by attaching the real estate of the defendants in Woodstock by lodging by the officer of a copy of the writ in the Woodstock town clerk’s office and by delivering “to Elizabeth Sherburne Res. Atty. for said defendants (a) like true and attested copy of said writ, with a list and description of property and estate so attached, with this my return thereon endorsed.”

The defendants…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kittredge v. Fairbanks Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API