Legal Opinion

Virgil v. Poole

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 20, 2003No. 02-55717; D.C. No. CV-99-00469-JTM/JAHPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Glenda Jo Virgil’s claim that she was a victim of ineffective assistance of counsel fails, because Virgil has not demonstrated that her counsel’s performance was constitutionally deficient.

The provisions of the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (“AED-PA”) apply because Virgil filed her federal habeas petition after the statute’s effective date. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 481, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000). To warrant habeas relief, Virgil must show that the state court’s denials of her state habeas petitions were “contrary to, or involved an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Babbitt v. CalderonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  5. Robert Lee HENSLEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Roger CRIST, Warden; Grant Woods, Attorney General, Respondents-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API