Legal Opinion

Rogovin v. Wasserman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 31, 2005PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alan J. Saks, J.), entered November 19, 2004, which granted defendant’s motion to the extent of setting aside the jury verdict as to future pain and suffering and ordering a new trial on all damages for pain and suffering unless plaintiff stipulated to reduce the award for future pain and suffering from $350,000 to $100,000, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The trial court did not err in refusing to add plaintiffs prior treating dentist to the verdict sheet for the purpose of apportionment. Even if this Court were to amend defendant’s answer sua sponte…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Zillman v. Meadowbrook Hospital Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  2. Huffman v. CorenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  3. Sprague v. MarshallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dansby v. TrumpatoriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API