Legal Opinion

Phillip Van Zant v. FL Parole Commission

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided January 21, 2009No. 07-12464UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant Phillip Van Zant appeals from the dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The district court dismissed Van Zant’s petition on the ground that it was untimely under the one year statute of limitations established by the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA”), codified at 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). Van Zant argued below that the one-year statute of limitations was tolled pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(2).

This court granted a certificate of ap-pealability (“COA”) as to the issue of whether the district court erred in determining…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Murray v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  2. Chavers v. Secretary, Florida Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  3. Sweet v. Secretary, Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  4. Diaz v. Secretary for the Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  5. Johnny Peoples v. Bruce ChatmanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Griffin v. McNeilDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2009
  2. Galbreath v. PayneDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API