Phillip Van Zant v. FL Parole Commission
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellant Phillip Van Zant appeals from the dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The district court dismissed Van Zant’s petition on the ground that it was untimely under the one year statute of limitations established by the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA”), codified at 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). Van Zant argued below that the one-year statute of limitations was tolled pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(2).
This court granted a certificate of ap-pealability (“COA”) as to the issue of whether the district court erred in determining…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Murray v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Chavers v. Secretary, Florida Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- Sweet v. Secretary, Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- Diaz v. Secretary for the Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Johnny Peoples v. Bruce ChatmanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Griffin v. McNeilDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2009
- Galbreath v. PayneDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2022