Legal Opinion

Rotan v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 25, 1932No. 6116PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Circuit Judge.

In this ease the following facts appear without dispute: Hugo Y. Neuhaus had been' conducting a brokerage business at Houston, Tex., for a number of years, under the firm name of Neuhaus & Co. By written agreements, the petitioner, George Y. Rotan, became a partner in the firm for five years, from January 1, 1920. In addition to the capital invested, Rotan paid Neuhaus individually $37,500 for a five-fourteenth interest in the good will of the business. The agreements provided that, in the event of Rotan’s death or incapacity before the expiration of the partnership, a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rotan v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1930

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Watson v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API