Legal Opinion

Quail v. Municipal Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 23, 1985No. B011540PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.*

Petitioner’s appeal from a judgment issued by the respondent court in favor of real party in its unlawful detainer action against *574him is pending in the Appellate Department of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. In the instant proceeding petitioner principally contends (1) the respondent did not properly carry out the settlement and engrossment of the settled statement on appeal, and (2) the engrossed settled statement certified by the respondent does not accurately set forth the proceedings in the trial court. (Cal. Rules of Court, rules 127, 128.)

On June 12, 1985,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Potter v. SolkAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1958

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  2. Lynch & Freytag v. CooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. County of Santa Clara v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Lynch & Freytag v. CooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. Quail v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API