Legal Opinion

Crosby v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 29, 1922PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.

1. Appellant was indicted for the crime of selling and being interested in the sale of intoxicating liquors. He demurred to the indictment on the ground that the court was without jurisdiction because the 18th amendment to the Federal Constitution and the Federal statute (Volstead act) superseded the State law under which appellant was indicted. The court overruled the demurrer.

This court, after an exhaustive review of the authorities upon the subject, has decided the precise question in the recent case of Alexander v. State, 148 Ark. 491, holding that the 18th amendment and the Volstead act…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Catlett v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1893
  2. Sharp v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1888
  3. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Co. v. CrabtreeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1901
  4. Neal v. BrandonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1902
  5. State v. WardlawSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1884

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  2. Hays v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  3. Watkins, Broomfield & Matlock v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  4. Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  5. Osborne v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API