Crosby v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.
1. Appellant was indicted for the crime of selling and being interested in the sale of intoxicating liquors. He demurred to the indictment on the ground that the court was without jurisdiction because the 18th amendment to the Federal Constitution and the Federal statute (Volstead act) superseded the State law under which appellant was indicted. The court overruled the demurrer.
This court, after an exhaustive review of the authorities upon the subject, has decided the precise question in the recent case of Alexander v. State, 148 Ark. 491, holding that the 18th amendment and the Volstead act…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Catlett v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1893
- Sharp v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1888
- St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Co. v. CrabtreeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1901
- Neal v. BrandonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1902
- State v. WardlawSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1884
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
- Hays v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
- Watkins, Broomfield & Matlock v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
- Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
- Osborne v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.