Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. Hill
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
NEUMAN, Justice.
This disciplinary action is before us for de novo review in accordance with Iowa Supreme Court Rule 118.10. The complaint stems from allegations that attorney Ralph William Hill (1) counseled an individual who was represented by another attorney, (2) taped telephone conversations without the knowledge of the other party to the conversation, and (3) allowed an appeal to be dismissed by default while misleading his client with regard to its status. We concern ourselves with only the third charge because the Grievance Commission found insufficient evidence to sustain the others…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. FreedSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. HillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. KellySupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. GlennSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
3Cited by3 opinions
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. HillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. GillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
- William B. McCallum v. Rosen's DiversifiedCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998