American Cyanamid & Chemical Corp. v. Joseph
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1DissentDore, J.
The basic issues are sufficiently stated in the learned opinion of the Presiding Justice.
I entirely agree that a resale certificate is not per se a complete and absolute protection; and that a fraudulently procured resale certificate does not protect the vendor. But in this case there is *103no claim of fraud by the comptroller; indeed, any such contention is rejected.
In considering this appeal we must constantly keep in mind that this petitioner is not sought to be taxed by the comptroller as a taxpayer, but is sought to be held liable as an unpaid tax collector, a vendor, selling chemicals…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Matter of Estate of SwiftNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Socony-Vacuum Oil Company, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- McLean v. . JephsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.