State v. Carter, 07-Je-32 (12-15-2008)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Dissent
{¶ 61} I respectfully dissent from the majority because neither this court nor the trial court had jurisdiction to consider the merits of Appellants' untimely petitions. For this reason I would dismiss Appellants' appeals for lack of jurisdiction.
{¶ 62} Appellants admit that they did not file their petitions for post-conviction relief within 180 days after the bulk of their trial transcripts were filed in this court in their appeals from their convictions, but claim that their petitions were nevertheless timely for two reasons: 1) the trial transcripts were not completely filed until a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Sabouri v. Ohio Department of Job & Family ServicesOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
- Collins v. SotkaOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Cleveland Knight v. Derrick SchofieldCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Crain v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.