Legal Opinion

In Re Garfunkel

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 13, 1924PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GODDARD, District Judge.

This is a petition to review an order of the referee in bankruptcy directing the trustees of the bankrupts to deliver to Max Kaminsky a note made by Harry Kaminsky and indorsed by Max Kaminsky, and now held by the trustees in bankruptcy of the firm of Garfunkel & Tauster.

On October 19,1923, a note for $500, made by Harry Kaminsky and indorsed by Max Kaminsky,'Was discounted by the bankrupts, who were engaged in the banking business. On February 4, 1924, the said Garfunkel & Tauster were adjudicated bankrupts, and subsequently the petitioners were appointed trustees. On…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Madison Square Bank v. PierceNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Twelfth Ward Bank v. BrooksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  3. Assets Realization Co. v. Mercantile National BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brunswick Corporation v. Howell W. Clements, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Olympic Lanes, Inc.,defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
  2. Tucson House Construction Co. v. FulfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  3. Irving Trust Co. v. RoseCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
  4. Tucson House Construction Company v. FulfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API