Legal Opinion

Keyter v. 230 Government Officers

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided May 20, 2005No. C04-5867 RJB CCLPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

LOVELL, Senior District Judge.

Before the Court in the above-captioned civil matter are four motions to dismiss filed by defense counsel, as joined by the Federal Defendants by stipulation of the parties, on behalf of 230 government officers. Also before the Court is Plaintiffs May 3, 2005, motion to disqualify the undersigned on the ground that I am “now a party to the case.” The Court, having considered the briefs of the parties, the entire record, and the applicable law, is prepared to rule on all pending motions.

PRIOR STATE & FEDERAL COURT LITIGATION

Plaintiff Anthony P. Keyter…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Freeze v. McDermottDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
  2. Grae-El v. City of SeattleDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2022
  3. O'Neill v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024
  4. Witzke v. Idaho State BarDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API