Legal Opinion

Globe & Republic Insurance v. Davis

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 15, 1936No. Appeal, 435PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, J.,

This is an appeal from the order of the court below discharging a rule to strike off a judgment entered against 'the garnishee in an attachment execution.

Plaintiff, having a judgment against Ralph B. Davis, issued an attachment execution naming Burton Davis, administrator of the estate of Jesse B. Davis, deceased, and the Aetna 'Accident and Liability Co. of Hartford, Conn., as garnishees. Service was made upon the defendant and Burton Davis, administrator of the estate of Jesse B. Davis, deceased. No service was made on the other garnishee. At the same time,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. King v. BrooksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1873
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. Armstrong v. CommissionersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1860
  3. Allen v. KripsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  4. Hill v. EganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  5. Commonwealth ex rel. Attorney-General v. WalterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Queen City Electrical Supply Co. v. Soltis Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. DavisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Queen City Electrical Supply Co. v. Soltis Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API