Legal Opinion

Utgard v. Helmerson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 13, 1938No. 31,661PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

Petitioner-relator, being dissatisfied with the findings and award of compensation made by the industrial commission, brings his case before us for review by means of certiorari.

In a memorandum opinion the commission has lucidly and accurately set forth the essential facts, which may be summarized thus: On June 9, 1936, and for some time prior thereto, relator had been employed by respondent-employer under a Minnesota contract of hire as a pieceworker at a weekly wage of $28.12. The employer was protected by liability insurance. The case was heard by a referee of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hill v. UmbehockerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  2. Ranwick v. NunanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  3. Henz v. Armour CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kundiger v. Waldorf Paper Products Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  2. Halloran v. TousignantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. Ristow v. Von BergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API