Legal Opinion
Puma v. New York City Transit Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 7, 2008PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant New York City Transit Authority appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Flug, J.), dated October 22, 2007, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion of the defendant New York City Transit Authority for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it is granted.
“In order to impose liability in a slip-and-fall case, there must be evidence tending to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Medina v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Przybyszewski v. Wonder Works Construction, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Varrone v. DinaroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Tresgallo v. Danica, L. L. C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Dominitz v. Food Emporium, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hutchinson v. Sheridan Hill House Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2015
- Witkowski v. Island Trees Public LibraryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Bishop v. MarshAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Wilks v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Bligen v. New York City Tr. Auth.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.