Legal Opinion · Dissent
People v. Kinkead
Illinois Supreme Court
Decided May 21, 1998No. 75236Published
1DissentJustice Heiple
Because the majority opinion seriously misconstrues both the law and the facts in this case in a variety of ways, I respectfully dissent.
At the time of this court’s first opinion in this case, the statute regarding a criminal defendant’s use of psychotropic medication provided as follows:
“A defendant who is receiving psychotropic drugs or other medications under medical direction is entitled to a hearing on the issue of his fitness while under medication.” 725 ILCS 5/104 — 21(a) (West 1994).
The statute was amended effective December 31, 1996, and now provides:
“A defendant who is receiving…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People v. MurphyIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
- First of America Trust Co. v. ArmsteadIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
- Ogdon v. GianakosIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
- People v. CortesIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. NitzIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.