Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Kinkead

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1998No. 75236Published

1DissentJustice Heiple

Because the majority opinion seriously misconstrues both the law and the facts in this case in a variety of ways, I respectfully dissent.

At the time of this court’s first opinion in this case, the statute regarding a criminal defendant’s use of psychotropic medication provided as follows:

“A defendant who is receiving psychotropic drugs or other medications under medical direction is entitled to a hearing on the issue of his fitness while under medication.” 725 ILCS 5/104 — 21(a) (West 1994).

The statute was amended effective December 31, 1996, and now provides:

“A defendant who is receiving…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. MurphyIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. First of America Trust Co. v. ArmsteadIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Ogdon v. GianakosIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
  4. People v. CortesIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  5. People v. NitzIllinois Supreme Court · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API