Legal Opinion

Montgomery Coca-Cola Bottling Co.

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 28, 1975No. 275-73PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tames; income tax; personal holding company; royalties; necessity for filing administrative claim for refwnd.. — On February 28,1975 the court issued the following order:

Before cowen, Chief Judge, kashiwa and bennett, Judges.

“This is a tax case in which the plaintiff claims a refund on the ground that it was not a personal holding company during the years in suit and was not subject to the taxes which defendant collected on income defendant determined was holding company income under Sections 541-543 of the Internal Bevenue Code of 1954. Plaintiff is an Alabama corporation. During the years…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railroad Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  2. Commercial Solvents Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  3. Medical-Surgical Group, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1960
  4. Irving Berlin Music Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Montgomery Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
  2. Pleasanton Gravel Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985
  3. Montgomery Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
  4. Pleasanton Gravel Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API