Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 14, 2018No. AC39945PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlawie, J.

The petitioner, Robert E. Thompson, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the court improperly concluded that he failed to prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that his trial counsel rendered deficient performance because he failed to move for a mistrial or to seek any curative measures following prejudicial testimony from the complainant. We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of the habeas court.

The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our resolution of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. Pisel v. Stamford HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  4. Small v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  5. State v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. White v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025
  2. Thompson v. Comm'r of Corr.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
  3. Thompson v. Commissioner of CorrectionsDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API