Legal Opinion

State v. Morales

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 9, 2013No. 30235-1-IIIPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSiddoway, J.

¶1 — The meaning of the harassment statute, RCW 9A.46.020, is central to Jesus Vidales Morales’s appeal of his conviction of two counts of felony harassment. He was convicted on one count for a harassment offense against the mother of his children, from whom he was estranged. His conviction on the other count might have been for a second harassment offense against her or might have been for a harassment offense against the third party to whom it was communicated. We agree with Mr. Morales that the criminal information did not put him on notice of one means advanced at trial by the State. We…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. State v. J.M.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. AdelWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. VladovicWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. AdelWashington Supreme Court · 1998

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Of Washington v. Adrian Munoz RiveraCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  2. State Of Washington v. David NovickCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  3. State v. Cody M.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2020
  4. Personal Restraint Petition Of William Neal FranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  5. State Of Washington v. Adrian Munoz RiveraCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API