Legal Opinion

Havemyer v. Luttinger

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 21, 1935PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

If the precept herein was not personally served, as claimed by the landlord, the judgment for rent should have been vacated. (Matter of McDonald, 225 App. Div. 403.) It was improper to require the tenant to deposit rent as a prerequisite to having the issue of service determined.

Order modified by striking out the conditions imposed, and as modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs to appellant, and trial of service of process set down for May 28, 1935.

All concur; present, Hammer, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re McDonaldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dolan v. LinnenCivil Court of the City of New York · 2003
  2. Wayside Homes, Inc. v. UptonNew York District Court · 1963
  3. 215 Bush Street Co. v. JoseCivil Court of the City of New York · 1990