Legal Opinion

United States v. Paul C. Villano

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 14, 1986No. 85-2535Published

1Opinion of the Court

797 F.2d 1547

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Paul C. VILLANO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 85-2535.

United States Court of Appeals,

Tenth Circuit.

Aug. 5, 1986.

Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Granted Oct. 14, 1986.

*

Baldock, Circuit Judge, dissented and filed opinion.

Arthur M. Schwartz, Denver, Colo., for defendant-appellant.

Robert N. Miller, U.S. Atty., Denver, Colo., and A. Mary Sterling, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Kansas City, Mo., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before HOLLOWAY, Chief Judge, LOGAN and BALDOCK, Circuit Judges.

LOGAN, Circuit Judge.

1

Defendant, Paul C. Villano, appeals the district…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. United States v. GagnonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API