Legal Opinion

Tammy Seago v. Mississippi Department of Employment Security

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided March 3, 2015No. 2013-CC-01843-COAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAXWELL, J.,

for the Court:

¶ 1. The sawmill where Tammy Seago worked discharged her for insubordination. The cited defiance was her refusal to sweep her work area, a violation of the employer’s work policy. Tammy sought unemployment benefits, claiming she did not have a broom and did not refuse to sweep. But the Mississippi Department of Employment Security (MDES) Board of Review found the employer’s testimony more credible than hers. Based on its finding that Tammy’s refusal to clean was misconduct, the Board denied benefits. Because credibility determinations are within the Board’s authority…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. ArriolaMississippi Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Richardson v. Employment SEC. Com'nMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Broome v. MISSISSIPPI EMPLOYMENT SEC. COM'NMississippi Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Bishop v. Mississippi Department of Employment SecurityCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2014
  5. Hunter v. Mississippi Department of Employment SecurityCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2013

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kenneth Haulcy v. Mississippi Department of Employment SecurityCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2015
  2. Kenneth Haulcy v. Mississippi Department of Employment SecurityCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API