Legal Opinion

Shaw v. Byram Tp.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 1, 1965PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

86 N.J. Super. 598 (1965)

207 A.2d 570

MADELINE SHAW, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v.

TOWNSHIP OF BYRAM, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued February 8, 1965.

Decided March 1, 1965.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, SULLIVAN and LABRECQUE.

Mr. Bernard F. Conway argued the cause for appellants.

Mr. Francis E. Bright argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Dolan & Dolan, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by SULLIVAN, J.A.D.

Plaintiffs appeal from that portion of a judgment of the trial court upholding the validity of an amendment to the "Waste…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lutz v. ArmourSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Earruso v. Board of Health, E. Hanover Twp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
  3. Township of Dover v. WittNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  4. Puntenney v. Wildeman & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1925
  5. State v. WittenbergNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dock Watch Hollow Quarry Pit v. Tp. of WarrenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  2. So. Ocean Landfill v. Mayor & Coun. Tp. of OceanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  3. Police Jury of the Parish of Acadia v. All TaxpayersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. Cranberry Lake Quarry Co. v. JohnsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  5. Verona v. ShalitNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API