Legal Opinion

Employment Department v. Hemke

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 5, 1998No. 96-AB-2481, 97-AB-127; CA A96297Published

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, C. J.

Petitioner Employment Department seeks review of the order of the Employment Appeals Board (EAB) determining that claimant was entitled to unemployment benefits because he was discharged. Petitioner requests reversal of EAB’s order and remand to consider whether claimant had good cause to leave work under ORS 657.176(2)(c). We reverse and remand.

Claimant was employed by a corporation, ElectroStatic Refinishers, from September 1,1986, through November 1, 1995. He was the sole shareholder of the corporation. On November 1,1995, he sold all of his interest in the corporation because of increases…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  2. Schmelzer v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  3. Employment Department v. ShurinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API