Legal Opinion

Subsequent Injury Trust Fund v. City of Atlanta

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 6, 2011No. A11A0688Published

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Presiding Judge.

In this case of first impression, we granted the Subsequent Injury Trust Fund’s (the “Fund”) 1 application for discretionary review to determine whether an employer’s advance payment to an employee under OCGA § 34-9-222 constitutes the payment of an income benefit for purposes of calculating the 78-week time limitation for filing a claim for reimbursement under OCGA § 34-9-362 (a). 2 The superior court found that the claim for reimbursement filed by Employer/Seif-Insurer City of Atlanta and its servicing agent, NovaPro Risk Solutions (collectively, the “City”) was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. GreenbaumSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  2. Mickens v. Western Probation Detention CenterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  3. Strickland v. Crossmark, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  4. Universal Ceramics, Inc. v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  5. Edgeman v. Organic Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API