Thomas Cole v. Foxmar, Inc., d/b/a Education and Training Resources
District Court, D. Vermont
1Opinion
Peba Gaile □□ □□□□ □□□ FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT eK FOR THE □□□□ DISTRICT OF VERMONT BY DEPUTY CLERK THOMAS COLE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) V. ) Case No. 2:18-cv-00220 ) FOXMAR, INC., d/b/a EDUCATION ) AND TRAINING RESOURCES, ) ) Defendant. ) OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S RENEWED MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS, GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES ON APPEAL, AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO APPLY CURRENT HOURLY RATE (Docs. 232, 250, & 251) 1. Factual and Procedural Background. Plaintiff brought this suit…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Blanchard v. BergeronSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Arbor Hill Concerned Citizens Neighborhood Ass'n v. County of Albany & Albany County Board of ElectionsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.