Farmer v. Anninos
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS; PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT DISMISSED IN ITS ENTIRETY; PLAINTIFF DIRECTED TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT UNDER CASE NO. C-3-81-285; INDIVIDUAL PARTIES ORDERED TO SUBMIT AFFIDAVITS UNDER CASE NO. C-3-81-285; TERMINATION ENTRY
RICE, District Judge.
Based upon the reasoning and citations of authority set forth by Defendants *137in support of their Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 4), filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1), the Court concludes that Defendant’s Motion, as it pertains to Plaintiff’s state law claims, is well-taken and dismisses said claims…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Tower v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Elizabeth A. Brandon and James D. Muse, Cross-Appellants v. Robert J. Allen, Defendant-Cross-Appellee, E. Winslow Chapman, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Black v. BayerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.