Legal Opinion

Farmer v. Anninos

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided August 31, 1984No. C-3-84-212Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS; PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT DISMISSED IN ITS ENTIRETY; PLAINTIFF DIRECTED TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT UNDER CASE NO. C-3-81-285; INDIVIDUAL PARTIES ORDERED TO SUBMIT AFFIDAVITS UNDER CASE NO. C-3-81-285; TERMINATION ENTRY

RICE, District Judge.

Based upon the reasoning and citations of authority set forth by Defendants *137in support of their Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 4), filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1), the Court concludes that Defendant’s Motion, as it pertains to Plaintiff’s state law claims, is well-taken and dismisses said claims…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Tower v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Elizabeth A. Brandon and James D. Muse, Cross-Appellants v. Robert J. Allen, Defendant-Cross-Appellee, E. Winslow Chapman, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  5. Black v. BayerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API