State Ex Rel. Benson v. Lakewood Cemetery
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Julius J. Olson, Justice.
The state appeals from an adverse judgment. These proceedings in quo warranto were brought at the instance of the attorney general. The relief sought was to restrain defendant, a public cemetery association, from engaging in business activities for profit, which activities are claimed to be beyond the powers conferred upon it by our statutes.
In view of the public interest involved and the care and thoroughness evidenced in briefs of counsel for the respective parties, we deem it essential that a rather complete statement of the facts as found by the court be made. '
Def…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dries v. Evans Cemetery Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- State v. Lakewood Cemetery Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- Hoesch v. FreedmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
3Cited by14 opinions
- Wing v. Forest Lawn Cemetery Assn.California Supreme Court · 1940
- City of Lewiston v. MathewsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
- Helvering v. Jewel Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
- Kopp v. BairdIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
- Gingrich v. Blue Ridge Memorial GardensSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.