Legal Opinion

Legler v. Muscatine Clinic

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 12, 1929PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wagner, J. —

Prior to December 20, 1926, one of plaintiff’s testicles became enlarged, and on or about the aforesaid date, there was performed upon him, by Dr. Bryant, assisted by Dr. Beveridge, one of the defendants, an operation, by which said organ and a portion of the spermatic cord were removed. Two laboratory tests were made, and one of them showed adenocarcinoma, and the other, embryonic carcinoma of the seminal tubuli, which means primary carcinoma (cancer) of the testicle. After the aforesaid laboratory tests were made, it was deemed advisable to give the plaintiff some X-ray…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. South v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Hysell v. Iowa Public Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  3. Lane v. VarlamosSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  4. Lewis v. Farmers Grain Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  5. Richard Henry Hysell and Barbara Hysell v. Iowa Public Service Company, and the City of Sioux City, Iowa v. Thurman Simpson, and Irving F. Jensen CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API