Knudsen v. Hannberg
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal írom a judgment of the district court of the first district and from an order refusing a new trial. The- opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the CourtMiner, J.
The facts are stated in the opinion. This case came on for trial before the first district court upon the following agreed statement of facts: “(1) James Knudsen died intestate July 30, 1890. (2) The defendant Julius Hann-berg was duly appointed administrator of the estate of the said deceased, and ever since has been, and now is, administrator of the said estate. (3) That after paying all the debts and 'liabilities of said estate, including costs of administration there is left in the hands- of the administrator, as assets of the said estate, real estate of the value of $3,500, and personal…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Cope v. CopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Hager v. . Nixon and Wife .Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1873
- Nicholas v. PurczellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
- Robinson v. BakerMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Turner v. BennettIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Territory v. Long Bell Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- State v. NormanUtah Supreme Court · 1898
- Kimball v. SalisburyUtah Supreme Court · 1898
- Cook v. HigLeyUtah Supreme Court · 1894
- In Re Mower's EstateUtah Supreme Court · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.