Legal Opinion

Graddy v. City of Tampa

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided January 23, 2014No. Case No. 8:12-cv-1882-T-24 EAJPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

SUSAN C. BUCKLEW, District Judge.

This cause comes before the Court on cross motions for summary judgment: (1) Defendants Barrett, Cornelius, and Smith’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 56), which Plaintiff opposes (Doc. No. 60); and (2) Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (Doe. No. 57), which Defendants Barrett, Cornelius, and Smith oppose (Doc. No. 63). As explained below, Plaintiffs motion is denied, and Barrett, Cornelius, and Smith’s motion is granted in part and denied in part.

I. Standard of Review

Summary judgment is appropriate “if the movant shows that there is no genuine…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Hope v. PelzerSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API