Graddy v. City of Tampa
District Court, M.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SUSAN C. BUCKLEW, District Judge.
This cause comes before the Court on cross motions for summary judgment: (1) Defendants Barrett, Cornelius, and Smith’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 56), which Plaintiff opposes (Doc. No. 60); and (2) Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (Doe. No. 57), which Defendants Barrett, Cornelius, and Smith oppose (Doc. No. 63). As explained below, Plaintiffs motion is denied, and Barrett, Cornelius, and Smith’s motion is granted in part and denied in part.
I. Standard of Review
Summary judgment is appropriate “if the movant shows that there is no genuine…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Hope v. PelzerSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.