Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Estate of Bell v. Olmstead

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided May 19, 2000No. 92,445Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partHansen, Presiding Judge

€ 1 This appeal arises from an unusual set of cireumstances. Appellant, Randy Olm-stead, personal representative for the estate of David Bell, was a neighbor and friend of David and Barbara Bell. When Olmstead filed his final accounting and petition for approval of fees, Heirs filed an objection to both. The trial court originally awarded Olmstead $127,029 but on Heirs' 12 0.98.1991 § 1031.1 motion to vacate it reduced the fee to $48,145. The trial court also awarded Olmstead $5,000 in legal fees incurred by him in defending his first application for attorney fees and $18,000 for attorney…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Heimbach v. ThornburgCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993
  2. Nearing v. State ex rel. Department of Public SafetyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API