Legal Opinion

In re Jahad R.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 3, 2009PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*424In its report accompanying the petition to have appellant adjudicated to be a person in need of supervision, the Administration for Children’s Services (ACS) states that “diligent efforts” have been made, that services have been “exhausted,” that appellant is “resistant to services,” and that there is “no substantial likelihood that the family will benefit from diversion services.” However, ACS failed to “clearly document! ]” any diligent attempts it made to provide appropriate services to appellant and his family before it was determined that it was substantially unlikely they would benefit…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Leslie H. v. Carol M.D.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jairy R. v. Jeffrey H.New York City Family Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API