Legal Opinion
Cartolano v. Tyrrell
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided October 21, 1976No. 75C4274PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MAROVITZ, District Judge.
Motions to Dismiss
I. Introduction
In this three-count action, plaintiff Anthony T. Cartolano charges the four named defendants and others with conspiracy to violate and actual violation of his constitutional rights through a systematic pattern of harassment, which allegedly included the abuse of process, unconstitutional search and seizure, malicious prosecution and defamation. According to plaintiff, the purpose and ultimate result of defendants’ conduct was to drive him out of his fireworks design and manufacture business. For the alleged wrongs,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Baltimore Steamship Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bell v. City of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Weiss v. Willow Tree Civic Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- Sager v. City of Woodland ParkDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1982
- Redfield v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. (In Re Robertson)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
- Sawmill Products, Inc. v. TOWN OF CICERO, ETC.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.