Legal Opinion
Srogi v. Cahill
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 16, 1972PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohn R. Tenney, J.
In this article 78 proceeding, the petitioners seek a judgment of this court reversing, annulling and *776setting aside certain ordinances overriding the Mayor’s veto of the amended budget and for a declaration that the budget as submitted by the Board of Estimate on September 27, 1972, be of the official budget of the City of Syracuse. The petitioners also seek an order directing the Common Council to levy the taxes based upon the September 27 budget.
The City of Syracuse is a municipal corporation governed by and pursuant to a charter established by Local Law No. 13 (Local Laws, 1960, No. 13 of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Matter of Green v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Dixon v. LaguardiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Barile v. City Comptroller of UticaNew York Supreme Court · 1968
- General Fireproofing Co. v. Keepsdry Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Richmond Railways, Inc. v. GilchristAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Culinary Institute of America v. Hyde Park Fire & Water DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977