Legal Opinion

Sherrill v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1895PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Clarii, J.:

The case on appeal was settled by the Judge. The defendant files an affidavit for certiorari on the ground that the word “not” was b3r inadvertence left out in an important part of the testimony and appends a telegram from the Judge, to that effect, expressing his readiness to make the correction. This complies with the requirements laid down in the authorities. Boyer v. Teague, 106 N. C., 571; Bank v. Bridgers, 114 N. C., 107. That the hearing might not be delayed, an instanter certiorari was ordered to issue and tbe cause placed at tbe end of tbe District to be called in its…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Attorney General Ex Rel. Boyer v. TeagueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. City National Bank of Norfolk v. BridgersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Barber v. Justice.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Hansley v. Jamesville & Washington RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  3. Wolfe v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Wolfe v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API