Legal Opinion

Bowen v. Briscoe

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1970No. B-1666PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMILTON, Justice.

Plaintiffs-respondents, Alfred Briscoe et ux., brought this suit for specific performance of a contract wherein plaintiffs agreed to sell and defendants agreed to purchase real property. Defendants-petitioners, Brooks Bowen et al., answered that plaintiffs could not perform their obligation under the contract because part of " the property described in the contract was encumbered by a highway easement. The trial court awarded judgment to plaintiffs, notwithstanding the jury verdict. The court of civil appeals affirmed the trial court’s judgment for specific performance. 442…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Uszenski v. McNabbCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  2. Bowen v. BriscoeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Smith v. HuesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  2. Advance Components, Inc. v. GoodsteinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  3. Searcy v. Conn (In Re Interdevelopment, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Texas · 1999
  4. Tamara Lynn Ramaker v. Jeanette Abbe, Gary Hobbs, Denise Lackey, Shelly Mattson, Stacy McCoy, Anita Paniagua and Amber Ross, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2013
  5. V. R. Fajkus v. BlandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API