Legal Opinion

McAdoo v. Martin

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 19, 1919No. 10692PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action for damages; from city court of Hinesville—Judge W. C. Hodges. May 19, 1919.

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

The plaintiff in the court below sued the director-general of railroads for $50 damages, alleging the killing of a valuable bird dog belonging to the plaintiff, by reason of the negligent operation of a locomotive belonging to the Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company while under the control of the director-general. The defendant did not contend that the defendant would not be liable for the negligent killing of the dog. Seaboard Air-Line Ry. v. McDonald, 19 Ga. App. 627 (91 S. E. 1053). A judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff. Held:

*486Decided November 19, 1919. Action for damages; from…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rush v. Southern Property Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  2. Hines v. ZellnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API