Legal Opinion

Darryl Burton v. David Dormire, Jeremiah Nixon

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 8, 2002No. 01-2259PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BYE, Circuit Judge.

The writ of habeas corpus balances the constitutional imperative of a fair criminal trial with respect for * state court judgments and the finality thereby achieved for victims of crime and society at large. The writ serves as a “bulwark against convictions that violate fundamental fairness,” Engle v. Isaac, 456 U.S. 107, 126, 102 S.Ct. 1558, 71 L.Ed.2d 783 (1982) (quotation omitted), by providing “an additional safeguard against compelling an innocent man to suffer an unconstitutional loss of liberty.” Stone v. Powell, 428 U.S. 465, 491 n. 31, 96 S.Ct. 3037, 49 L.Ed.2d…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ex parte FournierCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2015
  2. Burton v. St. Louis Board of Police CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
  3. RICHARD D. CLAY, — APPELLEE/CROSS v. MICHAEL BOWERSOX, — APPELLANT/CROSSCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
  4. DiMattina v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
  5. Johnson v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2012

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API