Legal Opinion

Chronister v. Payne

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided August 9, 1977No. Nos. 49788 and 49789PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ROMANG, Judge:

In both actions, which are companion cases, the Defendant filed a document entitled “Motion to Strike.” In the body of this motion it was stated:

Comes now the defendant appearing specially and for the purpose of this motion only, and moves the Court to strike the language on the return of the alias summons dated January 12, 1976, which summons states the following:

“Served Maurice W. Payne, D.O., by personally handing him a copy of the Petition and Summons, however, defendant resisted * * voluntary physical acceptance of said Petition and Summons by bolting and running.”

Defendant…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gray v. GraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  2. Stephenson v. HammonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  3. Russell v. McGinnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bumgarner v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API