Legal Opinion

Application of Fried

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 12, 1946PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIFKIND, District Judge.

By petition Philip Fried and others prayed for an order directing the United States Attorney to return books, checks and papers belonging to the petitioner Fried and suppressing them as evidence and for an order suppressing the confessions made by the petitioners. The grounds assigned are that the books, checks and papers were seized unlawfully and that the confessions were obtained by violating petitioner’s rights to prompt arraignment and by other unlawful means. Upon the petition an order to show cause issued and the matter came on for hearing and argument.

The…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Go-Bart Importing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Perlman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. Nueslein v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  5. United States v. PollerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. Ernest T. PageCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  2. The United States of America v. Louis C. Viale, Marino J. Faliero, Sr., Joseph S. Pinnavia, Louis a.abbonando, Anthony F. Fino and Nicholas S. LongoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  3. United States v. BiancoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
  4. Centracchio v. GarrityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1952
  5. Mario Di Bella v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API