Legal Opinion
Bellewood No. 1, L.L.C. v. LOMA
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided August 9, 2004No. 52190-0-IPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶1
Kennedy, J.
— The city of Issaquah (City) entered into a preannexation zoning agreement with Lutheran Outdoor *47Ministry Association Center for Renewal (LOMA). LOMA agreed to support the City’s annexation of certain property, including LOMA’s property, located in unincorporated King County, and the City agreed that, upon annexation, LOMA’s property would be rezoned so as to permit LOMA’s continued operation and expansion of its charitable operations. On May 6, 2002, the City adopted the zoning regulations that were to become effective when the properties were annexed, including the zoning…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Walker v. MunroWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Deschenes v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- City of Federal Way v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
- Concerned Organized Women & People Opposed to Offensive Proposals, Inc. v. City of ArlingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- DiGiovanni v. City of TukwilaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Clark County v. Rosemere Neighborhood Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Bellewood No. 1, L.L.C. v. LOMACourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004