Legal Opinion

Bent v. Renken

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided January 7, 1904PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from. Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Tenth District. Action by Richard M. Bent against Charles O. Renken. Appeal by defendant from a final order of dispossess in summary proceedings. Reversed.

1Opinion of the CourtGreenbaum, J.

The respondent instituted dispossess proceedings alleging in the petition that the defendant hired from him the store and basement in the premises 767 Tenth avenue, in the city of New York “for the term of one month from the 1st day of July, 1903, and by the month only,” which term “expired on the 1st day of August, 1903.” The petition also alleges the service of the five-days statutory notice required to be served upon a monthly tenant. The answer alleges a lease made and exécuted between the landlord and tenant dated on or about the 20th day of April, 1903, leasing the said premises for a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. PrindleCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1840
  2. Hungerford v. WagonerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  3. Hoffman v. AllenNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893
  4. Witt v. Mayor of New YorkThe Superior Court of New York City · 1868

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Carman v. Fox, New York County Courts1914
  2. Hand v. Knaul, New York County Courts1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API