Garden v. Frier
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
WOLF, Judge.
The appellants challenge a Summary Final Judgment in favor of the appellee, a land surveyor, and raise the issue of whether the trial court erred by finding the ap-pellee to be a professional within the meaning of section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes, the two-year professional malpractice statute of limitations. In Pierce v. AALL Ins. Co., Inc., 531 So.2d 84 (Fla.1988), the supreme court examined the term “professional” as used in section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes. The court determined that for purposes of that statute a “profession” would be defined as “a vocation requiring,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pierce v. AALL Ins. Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1988
- PENSACOLA EXEC. H. CONDO. ASS'N, INC. v. Baskerville-Donovan Engineers, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
3Cited by1 opinion
- Garden v. FrierSupreme Court of Florida · 1992