Legal Opinion

Hembree v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided August 31, 1926No. 6 Div. 960PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAMFORD, J..

The evidence for the state tended to prove the homicide charged, and that it was done with malice. That being the case, the general charge as requested by defendant was properly refused. Spelce v. State, 20 Ala. App. 412, 103 So. 694.

It is insisted that the court committed error in excluding from the showing for the absent defendant’s witness, Mrs. Ed Glass, certain designated statements. Even if some of these rulings should have been technically erroneous, the character of the testimony excluded was such as to render its exclusion harmless error. However, we find no error in the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Braham v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  2. McKenzie v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. Spelce v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
  4. Green v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  5. Harris v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Terry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  2. Hembree v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API