Cannon v. Harmon
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Union Chancery Court; J. M. Barker, Chancellor; One partner cannot foreclose for his pro rata of á partnership debt. 110 U. S. 215; 93 Ark. 451. The testimony shows a failure of consideration and false representations.-
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
On the .26-th day of March, 1912, W. M. Cannon executed a deed of trust on thirty acres of land in Union County, Arkansas, to J. W. Harmon as trustee to secure a note for $60, payable to McWilliams & Sample, a partnership. The note -represented the purchase price of a mule sold by-the partnership to Cannon. After the note became due F. L. Sample, a member of the firm of McWilliams & Sample, cau-sed the trustee named in the deed of trust to advertise the land for sale to satisfy an indebtedness of $33.75 which he claimed to be the amount of the partnership debt due him. Cannon instituted this…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ingham Lumber Co. v. IngersollSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
- Summers v. HeardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1899
- Coleman v. FisherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1899
- Matthews v. PaineSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1885
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sessoms v. BallardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923