Legal Opinion

Purcell v. Bryn Mawr Hospital

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 23, 1988No. 2821PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROWLEY, Judge:

This is an interlocutory appeal by permission from an order overruling the preliminary objections of appellant, Bryn Mawr Hospital, as to venue in a medical malpractice action. We affirm.

On September 20, 1985, plaintiffs Joan and James Purcell, residents of Chester County, Pennsylvania, and administrators of the estate of their daughter, Lindsay Hunter Purcell, commenced the instant medical malpractice action in Philadelphia County against Bryn Mawr Hospital (Bryn Mawr), which is located in Montgomery County. 1 Bryn Mawr filed preliminary objections as to venue asserting that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shambe v. Delaware Hudson R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Monaco v. Montgomery Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Burdett Oxygen Co. v. I. R. Wolfe & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Law v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Deeter-Ritchey-Sippel Associates v. Westminster CollegeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Purcell v. Bryn Mawr HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Masel v. GlassmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Deyarmin v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Panzano v. Lower Bucks HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Masel v. GlassmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API