Legal Opinion

Henry v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 15, 1879PublishedCited by 7 opinions

On the claimants7 Motions. The Reporters1 statement of tbe case: The facts and circumstances upon which, these motions were determined fully appear in the opinion of the court:

1Opinion of the Court

Drake; Ch. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court:

These cases are all claims preferred under the Abandoned and Captured Property Act; and all of them were referred to B. Eveleth, as commissioner of the court, for investigation and report, who reported in favor of each claimant.

In each case so referred, if, upon consideration of' the commissioner’s report, in connection with the evidence, the court considered the claimant entitled to recover, he was required, before entry of judgment in his favor, to pay the commissioner such sum as the court allowed as compensation for his services.

*164In these…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. McLemoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
  2. United States v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
  3. The United States v. BarkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1817
  4. The AntelopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  5. Tait ex rel. Browning & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1869

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fairmont Creamery Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Pardee v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
  4. Ford v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1883
  5. Goodrich v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API