Legal Opinion

Dees v. Dismuke

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1925No. 2860PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

BICKLEY, J.

The plaintiff (appellant) brought suit in the district court of Socorro county to foreclose the chattel mortgage described in the complaint. He joined as defendants W. S. Dismuke, the maker of the mortgage and the note secured thereby, and J. A. Montoya, who claimed an interest in the mortgaged property by virtue of an alleged landlord’s lien.

By appropriate pleadings the issues are joined between the plaintiff and the defendant J. A. Montoya, as to the priority of liens. The record shows that the facts were agreed upon by the parties, and show that prior to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Upper Appomattox Co. v. Hamilton & MannSupreme Court of Virginia · 1887
  2. Otero v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Lyons v. DeppenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1890
  4. Gasnick v. SteffensenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chessport Millworks, Inc. v. SolieNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Heyde v. State Securities, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
  3. National Investment Trust v. First National BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Diamond Trailer Sales Co. v. MunozNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Chessport Millworks, Inc. v. SolieNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API