Legal Opinion

Vanderhule v. Berinstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 28, 1954PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

A question has arisen as to the form of the order to be entered upon the court’s decision herein. It appears that, after the coming in of the jury’s verdict in favor of the plaintiffs, the trial court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint. The trial court’s order was not embodied in a formal written order but was entered in the clerk’s minutes pursuant to the court’s direction. This order necessarily carried with it, by implication, a setting aside of the jury’s verdict (see Civ. Prac. Act, § 457-a). It was this order which this court modified by striking out the direction…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Vanderhule v. BerinsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ponticas v. K.M.S. InvestmentsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Detone v. Bullit Courier Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. Kassman v. Busfield Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  4. Maristany v. Patient Support Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. Vincenzino v. CalvosaNew York Supreme Court · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API